<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/</link>
	<description>investigating other people's beliefs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Madewell</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Madewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Hey Eshu, I caught a few orbs in my camera at work. I have posted the pic on my blog. And you can right click the pictures all you want and you can download the original because I release it to the public domain.
http://superstitionfree.blogspot.com/2008/11/orbs-at-work.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eshu, I caught a few orbs in my camera at work. I have posted the pic on my blog. And you can right click the pictures all you want and you can download the original because I release it to the public domain.<br />
<a href="http://superstitionfree.blogspot.com/2008/11/orbs-at-work.html" rel="nofollow">http://superstitionfree.blogspot.com/2008/11/orbs-at-work.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Know your atheists - Eshu &#171; Right To Think</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Know your atheists - Eshu &#171; Right To Think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...] him through a link from Daylight Atheism, and now his weekly investigations into everything from ectoplasmic orbs to people who touch animals are one of my favourite parts of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] him through a link from Daylight Atheism, and now his weekly investigations into everything from ectoplasmic orbs to people who touch animals are one of my favourite parts of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never really understood the deal with orbs. Why would one expect a camera to pick up an image of a soul, anyway? If one accepts the whole spirit world concept, and, presumably, that people have souls, wouldn&#039;t it make more sense for it to be the other way around? That is, the camera, being an unconscious machine, composed of matter, without a soul, should not be able to see floating souls, while a person, being partly a spiritual entity, should more likely be able to see other souls floating around. It really doesn&#039;t make sense to believe that the semi-spiritual entity should have no ability to see the orbs, while a digital camera should see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never really understood the deal with orbs. Why would one expect a camera to pick up an image of a soul, anyway? If one accepts the whole spirit world concept, and, presumably, that people have souls, wouldn&#8217;t it make more sense for it to be the other way around? That is, the camera, being an unconscious machine, composed of matter, without a soul, should not be able to see floating souls, while a person, being partly a spiritual entity, should more likely be able to see other souls floating around. It really doesn&#8217;t make sense to believe that the semi-spiritual entity should have no ability to see the orbs, while a digital camera should see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yunshui</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>yunshui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-157</guid>
		<description>An ex-girlfriend of mine was a big fan of the execrable &quot;Most Haunted&quot; TV show, with Derek Acorah and Yvette &quot;AAAARGHIFELTSOMETHINGBRUSHPASTMYLEG!&quot; Fielding. They were big on orbs, and I remember alienating myself from her family by openly scoffing at the orbs on screen one evening. A piece of fluff does not a ghostie make, but you try telling that to a True Believer.

By the way, Orbs By Beans proved fascinating. Who knew bad photography could be so compelling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ex-girlfriend of mine was a big fan of the execrable &#8220;Most Haunted&#8221; TV show, with Derek Acorah and Yvette &#8220;AAAARGHIFELTSOMETHINGBRUSHPASTMYLEG!&#8221; Fielding. They were big on orbs, and I remember alienating myself from her family by openly scoffing at the orbs on screen one evening. A piece of fluff does not a ghostie make, but you try telling that to a True Believer.</p>
<p>By the way, Orbs By Beans proved fascinating. Who knew bad photography could be so compelling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eshu</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Eshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-151</guid>
		<description>A lot of people do that for copy-protection reasons, so it might not be fear of scrutiny. If they really believe it they shouldn&#039;t fear scrutiny... so when people do fear it, perhaps on some level they know they might be wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people do that for copy-protection reasons, so it might not be fear of scrutiny. If they really believe it they shouldn&#8217;t fear scrutiny&#8230; so when people do fear it, perhaps on some level they know they might be wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Madewell</title>
		<link>http://bridgingschisms.org/2008/09/orbs/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Madewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bridgingschisms.org/?p=120#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I looked at &quot;orbs by bean&quot;.

When I looked at the pictures, I noticed that a cheesy javascript is used to prevent you from right-clicking the picture. Probably to discourage anyone from saving a copy of the photo on their hard drives. It&#039;s silly because if you look at any picture on the net, you&#039;ve downloaded a copy to your machine (which can be retrieved). Also there&#039;s nothing to prevent me from viewing the page source and downloading a copy from the url in the code. If they don&#039;t want anyone saving a copy of their photos for closer scrutiny, then they shouldn&#039;t be posting them on the net at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at &#8220;orbs by bean&#8221;.</p>
<p>When I looked at the pictures, I noticed that a cheesy javascript is used to prevent you from right-clicking the picture. Probably to discourage anyone from saving a copy of the photo on their hard drives. It&#8217;s silly because if you look at any picture on the net, you&#8217;ve downloaded a copy to your machine (which can be retrieved). Also there&#8217;s nothing to prevent me from viewing the page source and downloading a copy from the url in the code. If they don&#8217;t want anyone saving a copy of their photos for closer scrutiny, then they shouldn&#8217;t be posting them on the net at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
